Extraterrestrial
By T.K. Randall
August 4, 2023 · 43 comments
Are 'non-human biologics' really alien ? Image Credit: CC BY 3.0 Bruce F Press
Neil deGrasse Tyson has weighed in on the debate over the 'non-human biologics' described by whistleblower David Grusch.
Perhaps the most interesting moment from the recent subcommittee hearing on UFOs was when David Grusch - who previously worked with the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and held top-level clearance at the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force - claimed that the US government had conducted a "multi-decade" program to recover and attempt to reverse-engineer crashed UFOs (or UAPs) and that "non-human biologics" had been found at some of the crash sites.
But what exactly did he mean by "non-human biologics" ?
While most people have interpreted this to be a reference to extraterrestrial entities, Neil deGrasse Tyson has instead suggested that this phrase could mean something else entirely.
"What would non-human biologics be?" he said.
"All I did was look at the kingdoms of life here on Earth. You have the plant kingdom, you have the animal kingdom, the microbial kingdom, the fungal kingdom."
"Let's add them all together and subtract from it humans."
"Everything that remains is non-human biologic."
"I don't know what they got squirreled away, but if it's non-human biologics, it could be anything on Earth."
Source: The Street | Comments (43)
Tags: Alien, Grusch
Other news and articles
Similar stories based on this topic:
Mystery 'implant' found during dissection of Peru's 'alien mummies'
10-25-2024
Astronomers scour TRAPPIST-1 system for alien signals
10-24-2024
New Netflix show 'Investigation Alien' revealed in new trailer
10-18-2024
Academic teases announcement about discovery of alien life
10-11-2024
Netflix documentary to investigate 'greatest alien abduction case'
10-7-2024
Study: aliens are also likely to suffer from the effects of climate change
10-6-2024
<< Previous story
More Americans than ever now believe in UFOs, polls suggest
Next story >>
Meg 2: the real story behind the extinct shark megalodon
Recent comments on this story
#34 Posted by skyeagle409 1 year ago
The objects in question were determined to be objects under intelligent controlled. In the case of the Navy UFO encounters, not many people are aware that multiple dissimilar sensors aboard the F/A-18s were carried by those aircraft which confirmedthe objects as machines under intelligent control because multiple sensors aboard the aircraft were slaved and focused on the objects that were being tracked.Here is a photo sample of an F-4 Phantom of just how clear the images of the UFOs in the Navy's videos would beusing from one of those passive sensors. The high level of image clarity of t... [More]
#35 Posted by Desertrat56 1 year ago
I think they used the term to obfuscate the fact that the non-human biologics were their test monkeys with computer chips in them to fly their experimental craft. They would rather we think aliens from outer space than know what kind of experiments the are doing.
#36 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps 1 year ago
Essan, technically, you are correct. However, ETH is a most logical theory, and although I have no problem with people that disagree, these people can never state what they think the situation is. Essan, would you care to explain what is going on with these supercrafts in the sky?
#37 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps 1 year ago
That's Ok. As long as the craft was of intelligent design and flown intelligently, then it clearly is a product of intelligent non-human life.
#38 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps 1 year ago
I agree with this, DR. I have been saying all along that the American government is pushing their reveal program with the specific intent of getting Americans to believe in UFO's and Aliens. But I'm not really sure why they are doing this and, if they being truthful.
#39 Posted by Essan 1 year ago
They are obviously testing their special cloaking device that makes them wholly invisible to anyone with a camera Hence we still have absolutely no real evidence whatsoever that any craft of any origin even exist. (Lights in the sky and radar returns are not evidence of physical nuts and bolts aircraft)
#40 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps 1 year ago
Apparently, Essan, you do not put any stock in the military's revelations in recent years?! that's fine. I don't blame you
#41 Posted by joc 1 year ago
bs
#42 Posted by Desertrat56 1 year ago
I think think they are being as "truthful" as further's their agenda, what ever that is. In the olden days it was to make Russia and China think that the U.S. and maybe the UK had alien technology and the aid of aliens from outer space (or some technologically advanced group). Now for some reason they want their own citizens to think this. Maybe it is like that awful tv show V or maybe it is smoke and mirrors to hide what they have been doing using some of us as guinea pigs.
#43 Posted by Trelane 1 year ago
That is correct. Although other parts of his statements were altered from his initial complaint to the testimony under oath.
Click here to view all 43 comments on this story
Please Login or Register to post a comment.